Embrace, extend and extinguish

[Thomas Sødring]

On 03/18/2017 11:53 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Thomas Sødring]
>> Is it worth it? For teaching purposes? I guess not. I accept this
>> point and during the week I will push out a commit that ensures only
>> Norwegian fieldnames are used.
> I am very happy to know we agree on this one.  We should stick as close
> to the specification as possible, and try to get the specification
> changed when we need to deviate due to internal conflicts in the
> specification or when we need to provide a operation that is not
> mentioned in the specification (like the planned import API).
>
I agree! The latest commit will hopefully resolve this issue. Only
Norwegian field names can be used. Thanks for pushing this as an issue.

Just a quick note on status. We are a little behind.  I had hoped to
have the 0.2 release done a week ago. We've been fighting with the
interface standard. Petter has started a defect-report process and
hopefully we can start getting some feedback from Riksarkivet. One thing
that has become clear from our #nikita discussions is that this version
of the interface standard is clearly influenced by the vendors of Noark
komplett solutions. I believe the interface is lacking the perspective
required for a free-standing Noark 5 core to be integrated with
specialised systems (frittstående Noark 5 kjerne for fagsystem
integrasjon). Hopefully we can get these perspectives in as well.

 - Tom